Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ci/add workflow #42

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Ci/add workflow #42

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

DanielRivers
Copy link
Contributor

Explain your changes

Adding workflow

Checklist

🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new test file named main.test.ts that employs the Vitest framework to validate the exports of the main.ts module. The test suite is organized using describe and it functions and includes a single test case that ensures no additional exports are present in the main module beyond those expected. The actual exports are retrieved and compared against a predefined list of expected exports after sorting both arrays for accuracy. Additionally, the .prettierignore file has been updated to include two new entries.

Changes

File Change Summary
lib/main.test.ts Added a new test file to verify exports of main.ts using Vitest, structured with testing functions.
.prettierignore Added entries for spec/kinde-mgmt-api-specs.yaml and renovate.json.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Tester
    participant Vitest
    participant MainModule

    Tester->>Vitest: Run tests in main.test.ts
    Vitest->>MainModule: Retrieve exports
    MainModule-->>Vitest: Return actual exports
    Vitest->>Tester: Compare actual exports with expected exports
    Tester-->>Vitest: Verify match
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • test: test exported items #41: This PR introduces a test file lib/main.test.ts that validates the exports of the main.ts module, which directly aligns with the changes made in the main PR that also focuses on testing the exports of the same module.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@DanielRivers has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6faeb5a and 0ae0dc4.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6faeb5a and 0ae0dc4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .prettierignore (1 hunks)
  • lib/main.test.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .prettierignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lib/main.test.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/main.test.ts (1)

8-140: Consider enhancing the export verification test

While the basic export verification is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Verify export types, not just names
  2. Externalize the expected exports list
  3. Add basic smoke tests for critical exports

Example implementation:

// expected-exports.ts
export const expectedExports = {
  types: [
    '$add_organization_users_response',
    // ... other types
  ],
  utils: [
    'checkAudience',
    // ... other utils
  ],
  init: ['init']
};

// main.test.ts
import { expectedExports } from './expected-exports';

describe('main.ts exports', () => {
  it('should export all expected items with correct types', () => {
    const actualExports = Object.keys(main).sort();
    const allExpectedExports = Object.values(expectedExports)
      .flat()
      .sort();
    
    expect(actualExports).toEqual(allExpectedExports);
    
    // Verify types of key exports
    expect(typeof main.init).toBe('function');
    expect(typeof main.checkAudience).toBe('function');
    // Add more type checks for critical exports
  });
});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be2dd9c and 6faeb5a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/build-test-ci.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/main.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: main (20.x)
lib/main.test.ts

[failure] 1-1:
All imports in import declaration are unused.


[failure] 2-2:
'beforeEach' is declared but its value is never read.


[failure] 2-2:
'afterAll' is declared but its value is never read.


[failure] 2-2:
'vi' is declared but its value is never read.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/main.test.ts (2)

6-7: LGTM! Clear and focused test suite structure

The test suite is well-organized with a clear purpose of verifying main.ts exports.


1-141: PR objective and changes mismatch

The PR is titled "Ci/add workflow" but the changes introduce a test file instead. Please clarify if:

  1. The workflow changes are missing from this PR
  2. The PR title/description needs updating
  3. This test file is part of a larger workflow setup

Let's check for workflow-related files:

✅ Verification successful

PR objective and changes are aligned

The PR objective matches the changes. The workflow file .github/workflows/build-test-ci.yml is newly added in this PR, which sets up CI for building and testing. The test file addition is complementary to this workflow setup as it's part of the test suite that will be executed by the new CI workflow.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for workflow files that might be part of this PR
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/

Length of output: 76


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the workflow file to see if it's newly added
git log --diff-filter=A -- .github/workflows/build-test-ci.yml | head -n 1

# Also check if this file was modified in this PR
git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- .github/workflows/build-test-ci.yml

Length of output: 1366

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: main (20.x)

[failure] 1-1:
All imports in import declaration are unused.


[failure] 2-2:
'beforeEach' is declared but its value is never read.


[failure] 2-2:
'afterAll' is declared but its value is never read.


[failure] 2-2:
'vi' is declared but its value is never read.

lib/main.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DanielRivers DanielRivers merged commit 5f06aef into main Nov 18, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant